Institute for Political Studies

11 Dobrinjska Street
(4th floor)
11000 Belgrade

Contact details
SR
SR
Политичка ревија 1/2020

ВЕЗА ПАРТИЈСКЕ ИДЕОЛОГИЈЕ И ЈАВНЕ ПОТРОШЊЕ У ЕМПИРИЈСКИМ ИСТРАЖИВАЊИМА

UDCУДК 329.058:330.567.4 Pages285-309 Year2020
Download PDF 10.22182/pr.6312020.11
Research overview

Abstract

Постојећи фонд научне литературе, нарочито оне из области политичких наука и политичке економије, у релативно обимној мери садржи студије које су се бавиле истраживањем утицаја партијских идеологија на економске исходе, конкретније – на јавну потрошњу. Географско-политички овај научни фонд може бити подељен у две групе: прва се односи на радове аутора који су испитивали утицај партијске компоненте на потрошњу у развијеним демократијама, док се друга односи на несразмерно мањи број студија у којима је ова корелација доказивана на случајевима тзв. нових демократија, углавном оних са истока европског континента. Упркос укупно великом броју истраживања и бројним доказима у корист хипотезе, политикологија и даље није дала дефинитиван одговор у погледу јачине ефекта који идеологија има на фискална кретања, те се на концу ради о још увек актуелној дебати међу истраживачима – иако се она одвија са мањим интензитетом него крајем двадесетог века.

Sources and literature

References

  1. Aaskoven, L. & Lassen, D. D. „Political Budget Cycles“, in W. R. Thompson, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford University Press, 2017.
  2. Bäck, H., Meier, H. E. &Persson, T. „Party Size and Portfolio Payoffs: The Proportional Allocation of Ministerial Posts in Coalition Governments“,The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15/1, 2009, 10-34.
  3. Berry, W. D. & Lowery, D. Understanding United States Government Growth: An Empirical Analysis of the Postwar Era, Praeger, New York,1987.
  4. Blais, A., Blake, D. & Dion, S. „Do Parties Make a Difference? Parties and the Size of Government in Liberal Democracies“,American Journal of Political Science, 37/1,1993, 30-62.
  5. Bove, V. &Efthyvoulou, G. „Political Cycles in Public Expenditure: Butter vs. Guns“,Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series, No. 2013016,The University of Sheffield, 2013.
  6. Browne, E. C. & Franklin, M. N. „Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies“,The American Political Science Review, 67/2, 1973, 453-469.
  7. Golden, D. G. & Poterba, J. M. „The Price of Popularity: The Political Business Cycle Reexamined“,American Journal of Political Science, 24/4, 1980, 696-714.
  8. Imbeau, L. M., Petry, F. &Lamari, M. „Left-right party ideology and government policies: A meta-analysis“,European Journal of Political Research, 40/1, 2001, 1–29.
  9. Kitschelt, H. „Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies“,Party Politics, 1/4, 1995, 447-472.
  10. Kittel, B. &Obinger, H. „Political Parties, Institutions, and the Dynamics of Social Expenditure in Times of Austerity“,Journal of European Public Policy, 10/1, 2003, 20-45.
  11. Klomp, J. & de Haan, J. „Politicalbudgetcyclesandelectionoutcomes“, PublicChoice, 157/1-2, 2013, 245-267.
  12. Laver, M. & Budge, I. Party Policy and Government Coalitions,The Macmillan Press, London, 1992.
  13. Laver, M. &Shepsle, K. A. Making and Breaking Governments, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  14. Lewis-Beck, M. & Rice, T. W. „Government Growth in the United States”, Journal of Politics, 17/1, 1985, 2-30.
  15. Manifesto Project, Internet, https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/, 13.01.2020.
  16. Markus, G. „Party System and Cleavage translation in Hungary“,Working Papers of Political Science, No. 3, Institute for Political Sciences of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, 1996.
  17. Murrell, P. „The Size of Public Employment: An Empirical Study“,Journal of Comparative Economics, 9/4, 1985, 424-437.
  18. Pavlović, D. &Bešić, M. „The Budget Dilemma and Public Spending: Evidence from Ten Postcommunist Countries“,Serbian Political Thought, 10/2, 2014, 133-157.
  19. Pavlović, D. & Bešić, M. „Political institutions and fiscal policy: evidence from post-communist Europe“,East European Politics, 35/2,2019, 220-237.
  20. Pampel, F. & Williamson, J. B. „Welfare Spending in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 1958-1980“,American Journal of Sociology,93/6,1988, 1424-1456.
  21. Pickering, A. &Rockey, J. „Ideology and the Growth of Government“,The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93/3, 2011, 907-919.
  22. Potrafke, N. „Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries“,Economics of Governance, 12/2, 2011, 101-134.
  23. Rice, T. W. „The Determinants of Western European Government Growth 1950-1980“,Comparative Political Studies, 19/2, 1986, 233-257.
  24. Rueschemeyer, M. &Wolchik, S. L. „The Return of Left-Oriented Parties in East Germany and the Czech Republic and Their Social Policies“, in L. J. Cook, M. A. Orenstein & M. Rueschemeyer, Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe, 109-143, Westview Press, Oxford, 1999.
  25. Solano, P. L. „Institutional Explanation of Public Expenditure among High Income Democracies“,Public Finance, 38/3, 1983, 440-458.
  26. Schmidt, M. G. „When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Party Influence on Public Policy“,European Journal of Political Research, 30/2, 1996, 155-183.
  27. Swank, D. H. „The Political Economy of Government Domestic Expenditure in the Affluent Democracies, 1960 – 1980“,American Journal of Political Science, 32/4, 1988, 1120-1150.
  28. Tavits, M. &Letki, N. „When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe“,American Political Science Review, 103/4, 2009, 555–569.
  29. Frey, B. „Politico-Economic Models and Cycles“,Journal of Public Economics, 9/2, 1978, 203-220.
  30. Fukuyama, F. „The End of History?“,The National Interest, 16 (Summer 1989), 3-18.
  31. Хејвуд, Е. Политичке идеологије: Увод, Завод за уџбенике, Београд, 2005.
  32. Hibbs, D. A. „Political parties and macroeconomic policy“,American Political Science Review, 71/4,1977, 1467-1487.
  33. Hicks, A. & Swank, D. H. „On the Political Economy of Welfare Expansion: A Comparative Analysis of 18 Advanced Capitalist Democracies, 1960-1971“,Comparative Political Studies, 17/1, 1984, 81-119.
  34. Holzner, M. „Inequality, Growth and Public Spending in Central, East and Southeast Europe“,WIIW Working Paper, No. 71, Wiener InstitutfürInternationaleWirtschaftsvergleiche, Wien, 2010.
  35. Cameron, D. R. „The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis“,American Political Science Review, 72/4, 1978, 1243-1261.
  36. Careja, R. &Emmenegger, P. „The Politics of Public Spending in Post-Communist Countries”, East European Politics and Societies, 23/2, 2009, 165-184.
  37. Carruthers, B. G. & Babb, S. L. Economy/Society: Markets, Meanings, and Social Structure, Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, 2000.
  38. Castles, F. G. &Mair, P. „Left-Right Political Scales: Some “Expert” Judgments“,European Journal of Political Research, 12/1, 1984, 73-88.
  39. Coman, E. E. „When left or right do not matter: Ideology and spending in Central and Eastern Europe“,Research & Politics, 6/1, 2019, 1-9.
  40. Comiskey, M. „Electoral Competition and the Growth of Public Spending in 13 Industrial Democracies, 1950 to 1983“,Comparative Political Studies, 26/3, 1993, 350-374.
  41. Cook, L. J. & Orenstein, M. A. „The Return of the Left and Its Impact on the Welfare State in Poland, Hungary and Russia“, in L. J. Cook, M. A. Orenstein & M. Rueschemeyer, Left Parties and Social Policy in Postcommunist Europe, 47-108, Westview Press, Oxford, 1999.
  42. Crepaz, M. „Consensus versus Majoritarian Democracy: Political Institutions and their Impact on Macroeconomic Performance and Industrial Disputes“, Comparative Political Studies, 29/1, 1996, 4-26.
From the same issue

Related publications