Институт за политичке студије

Добрињска 11
(IV спрат)
11000 Београд

Контакт подаци
EN
EN
Архив за правне и друштвене науке 4/2024

ПОТЕНЦИЈАЛНИ ПРАВЦИ ИЗМЕНЕ ЗАКОНА О БЕСПЛАТНОЈ ПРАВНОЈ ПОМОЋИ ПРЕМА ГРЕВИО ИЗВЕШТАЈИМА

Аутори
УДКУДК 343.851:343.62 Стране. Година2024
Преузми PDF 10.5937/adpn2404043T
Преглед истраживања

Сажетак

Право на бесплатну правну помоћ представља важан сегмент права на правично суђење, гарантовано бројним међународним документима. Последњих година нарочиту пажњу привлаче захтеви Истанбулске конвенције оваплоћени кроз ГРЕВИО извештаје за државе потписнице ове конвенције. Стога аутор у раду, након уводних разматрања о бесплатној правној помоћи, укратко објашњава међународне акте којима је предвиђено право на бесплатну правну помоћ, након чега анализира ставове Групе експерата за акцију против насиља над женама и насиља у породици изражене кроз извештаје о примени Истанбулске конвенције. У закључним разматрањима аутор сумира запажања и даје предлоге и препоруке у ком правцу би Закон о бесплатној правној помоћи Републике Србије могао да се мења.

Извори и литература

Референце

  1. Радојевић, Мијодраг. 2020. Бесплатна правна помоћ у јединицама локалне самоуправе – између правне норме и стварности. Администрација и јавне политике 13(1), стр. 5–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22182/ajp.1312020.1
  2. Радојевић, Мијодраг. 2018. Систем (бесплатне) правне помоћи у Републици Србији и примена међународних стандарда. Српска политичка мисао, 25(4), стр. 249‒265.
  3. Станковић, Марко. 2018. Право на правну помоћ у уставном систему Републике Србије ‒ прилог расправи о доношењу Закона о бесплатној правној помоћи. Правна ријеч: Часопис за правну теорију и праксу, 15(54), стр. 165‒179. doi 10.7251/PR5418165S
  4. Станковић, Сања. 2020. Анализа одредаба Закона о бесплатној правној помоћи Републике Србије које уређују бесплатну правну помоћ у прекограничном спору de lege lata и de lege ferenda. Зборник радова Правног факултета у Нишу 59(86), стр. 253–271. doi 10.5937/zrpfn0-25177
  5. Турањанин, Вељко и Чановић, Јелена. 2022. Бесплатна правна помоћ за жртве родно заснованог насиља из перспективе адвоката. Безбедност 64(2), стр. 44–60. doi 10.5937/bezbednost2202044T.
  6. Daniels, Stephen & Martin, Joanne. 2009. “Legal Services for the Poor: Access, Self-Interest, and Pro Bono”. In Rebecca Sandefur (ed.), Access to Justice (pp. 145–166). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https:// doi.org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012010
  7. De Ávila, Thiago Pierobom. 2022. “Evolution of Victims’Access to Criminal Justice in Brazil”. In
  8. Pamela Cox & Sandra Walklate (eds.), Victims’ Access to Justice: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 209–226). New York: Routledge.
  9. Kahale, Özgur. 2021. “How Can Law Firms Contribute to Access to Justice in an Age of Technology and Digitalisation? Pro Bono, Law Firm Innovation and Ideas for the Legal Community”. In Siddhart Peter de Souza & Maximilian Spohr (eds.), Technology, Innovation and Access to Justice: Dialogues on the Future of Law (pp. 19–31). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473880-008
  10. Kunst, Maarten, Schot, Joyc & Pemberton, Antony. 2022. “Victim Participatory Rights in Dutch Criminal Proceedings: A Review of Research on Their Potential Effectiveness”. In Pamela Cox & Sandra Walklate (eds.), Victims’ Access to Justice: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 174–190). New York: Routledge.
  11. Longe, Odunoluwa. 2021. “Future of Law – Increasing Access to Justice through Technology”. In Siddharth Peter de Souza & Maximilian Spohr (eds.), Technology, Innovation and Access to Justice: Dialogues on the Future of Law (pp. 54–68). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473880-010
  12. Mileusnić, Damjan. 2020. Studija: Uticaj Zakona o besplatnoj pravnoj pomoći na rad organizacija civilnog društva. Beograd: Partneri Srbija.
  13. Mowbray, Alastair. 2004. The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford, Portland: Hart Publishing.
  14. Murayama, Masayuki. 2009. “Expanding Access to Lawyers: the Role of Legal Advice Centers”. In Rebecca Sandefur (ed.), Access to Justice (pp.
    167–202). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi. org/10.1108/S1521-6136(2009)0000012011
  15. Pokrajinski ombudsman. 2013. Pravna pomoć u jedinicama lokalne samouprave (Autonomna pokrajina Vojvodina – rezultati istraživanja): Priručnik o europskom pravu u području pristupa pravosuđu. Luksemburg: Savet Evrope.
  16. Priručnik o europskom pravu u području pristupa pravosuđu. Luksemburg: Savet Evrope, 2016
  17. Rhode, Deborah. 2004. Access to Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Sandefur, Rebecca. 2007. Lawyers’ Pro bono service and American-style civil legal assistance. Law and Society Review, 41(1), pp. 79–112. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00292.x
  19. Storskrubb, Eva & Ziller, Jacques. 2007. “Access to Justice in European Comparative Law”. In Francesco Francioni (ed.), Access to Justice as a Human Right (pp. 311–350). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233083.003.0006
  20. Summers, Sarah. 2007. Fair Trials. Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  21. Svensson, Kerstin and Gallo, Carina. 2022. “The Swedish Welfare Model and the Development of Social Services for Crime Victims”. In Pamela Cox and Sandra Walklate (eds.), Victims’ Access to Justice: Historical and Comparative Perspectives (pp. 159–173). New York: Routledge.
  22. Trifković, Miljana, Ćurčić, Danilo i Marković Nađa (priredili). 2020. Primena Zakona o besplatnoj pravnoj pomoći: iz ugla interno raseljenih lica. Beograd: Inicijativa za ekonomska i socijalna prava.
  23. United Nations Development Programme. 2005. Access for All: Practitioner’s Guide to Human Rights-Based Approach to Access to Justice. Bangkok: United Nations Development Programme.
  24. Vasić, Milena i Filipović, Milan. 2021. Pravo na besplatnu pravnu pomoć žrtvama rodno zasnovanog nasilja u Srbiji u toku 2020. godine. Beograd:
    YUCOM.
  25. Wiik, Astrid 2021. “Friend or Foe? Examining the Potential and Pitfalls of ICTs in Improving Access to Justice in Post-conflict Countries”. In Siddhart Peter de Souza & Maximilian Spohr (eds.), Technology, Innovation and Access to Justice: Dialogues on the Future of Law (pp. 208–228). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474473880-019
  26. ИНТЕРНЕТ ИЗВОРИ
  27. Shittu, Wahab. 2015. “The challenges of access to justice”. The Guardian. https://guardian.ng/opinion/the-challenges-of-access-to-justice (15.12.2024).
  28. ИЗВОРИ ПРАВА
  29. Универзална декларација о људским правима, UN General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 217 A (III), 10 December 1948.
  30. Међународни пакт о грађанским и политичким правима, UN General Assembly, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171, 16 December 1966.
  31. Конвенција о елиминацији свих облика дискриминације жена,
    UN General Assembly, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13, 18 December 1979.
  32. Европска конвенција о људским правима и основним слободама, Council of Europe, European Convention on Human Rights, as amended by Protocols Nos. 11, 14 and 15, ETS No. 005, 4 November 1950.
  33. Конвенција Савета Европе о спречавању и борби против насиља над женама и насиља у породици (Истанбулска конвенција), Council of Europe, The Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence, ISBN 978-92-871-79906, November 2014.
  34. Повеља Европске уније о основним правима (Charter of Fundamental
  35. Rights of the European Union), Official Journal of the European Communities C 364/1, 18.12.2000.
  36. Кривични законик, Службени гласник РС 85/2005, 88/2005 - испр., 107/2005 - испр., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019 и 94/2024)
  37. Закон о бесплатној правној помоћи, Службени гласник РС 85/2005, 88/2005 - испр., 107/2005 - испр., 72/2009, 111/2009, 121/2012, 104/2013, 108/2014, 94/2016, 35/2019 и 94/2024.
  38. ПРЕСУДЕ ЕВРОПСКОГ СУДА ЗА ЉУДСКА ПРАВА
  39. Airey v. Ireland, App. No. 6289/73, October 09, 1979.
  40. Artico v. Italy, App. No. 6694/74, July 13, 1980.
  41. Pakelli v. Germany, App. No. 8398/78, April 25, 1983.
  42. Goddi v. Italy. App. No. 8966/80, April 09, 1984.
  43. Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, App. No. 9562/81 and 9818/82, March 02, 1987.
  44. Granger v. The United
  45. Kingdo, App. No. 11932/86, March 28, 1990.
  46. Alimena v. Italy, App. No. 11910/85, January 24, 1991.
  47. Quaranta v. Switzerland, App. No. 12744/87, May 24, 1991.
  48. Croissant v. Germany, App. No. 13611/88, September 25, 1992.
  49. Pham Hoang v. France, App. No. 13191/87, September 25, 1992.
  50. Boner v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 18711/91, October 28, 1994.
  51. Maxwell v. the United Kingdom, App. No. 18949/91, October 28, 1994.
  52. Benham v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 19380/92, June 10, 1996.
  53. Twalib v. Greece, App. No. 24294/94, June 09, 1998.
  54. Perks and Others v. the United Kingdom, App. Nos. 25277/94, 25279/94, 25280/94, 25282/94, 25285/94, 28048/95, 28192/95 and 28456/95, October 12, 1999.
  55. Caresana v. The United Kingdom, App. No. 31541/96, August 29, 2000. R. D. V. Poland, App. Nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, December 18, 2001.
  56. Czekalla v. Portugal, App. No. 38830/97, October 10, 2002.
  57. Lagerblom v. Sweden, App. No. 26891/95, January 14, 2003.
  58. Tsonyo Tsonev v. Bulgaria (No. 2), App. No. 2376/03, January 14, 2010.
  59. Tsonev v. Bulgaria (No. 3), App. No. 21124/04, October 16, 2012.
  60. Zdravko Stanev v. Bulgaria, App. No. 32238/04, November 06, 2012.
  61. Shekhov v. Russia, App. No. 12440/04, June 19, 2014.
  62. Volkov and Adamskiy v. Russia, App. Nos. 7614/09 and 30863/10, March 26, 2015.
  63. Dvorski v. Croatia, App. No. 25703/11, September 20, 2015.
  64. Mikhaylova v. Russia, App. No. 46998/08, November 19, 2015.
  65. ИЗВЕШТАЈИ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЈЕ ГРЕВИО
  66. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Denmark, Strasbourg, 2017.
  67. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Montenegro, Strasbourg, 2018.
  68. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Finland, Strasbourg, 2019.
  69. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): France, Strasbourg, 2019.
  70. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Netherlands, Strasbourg, 2019.
  71. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): North Macedonia, Strasbourg, 2019.
  72. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Andorra, Strasbourg, 2020.
  73. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Belgium, Strasbourg, 2020.
  74. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Italy, Strasbourg, 2020.
  75. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Spain, Strasbourg, 2020.
  76. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Bosnia and Herzegovina, Strasbourg, 2022.
  77. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Cyprus, Strasbourg, 2022.
  78. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Estonia, Strasbourg, 2022.
  79. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Georgia, Strasbourg, 2022.
  80. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Germany, Strasbourg, 2022.
  81. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Island, Strasbourg, 2022.
  82. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Norway, Strasbourg, 2022.
  83. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Romania, Strasbourg, 2022.
  84. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Croatia, Strasbourg, 2023.
  85. GREVIO, GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention): Greece, Strasbourg, 2023.
  86. GREVIO, First Thematic Evaluation Report: Building Trust by Delivering Support, Protection and Justice: Аlbania, Strasbourg, 2024.
Из истог броја

Повезане публикације