Institute for Political Studies

11 Dobrinjska Street
(4th floor)
11000 Belgrade

Contact details
SR
SR
Српска политичка мисао 3/2026

KEY ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF THE TOTAL DEFENCE CONCEPT IMPLEMENTATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Authors
UDCUDC 355.1:351.86(497.11) Pages151-173 Year2026
Download PDF 10.5937/spm97-65407
Research overview

Abstract

The author analyses the key ethical challenges of implementing the concept of total defense in the Republic of Serbia, starting from the assumption that normatively unresolved dilemmas may undermine its functional and moral sustainability. After conceptually defining total defense as a model that entails the comprehensive participation of all societal actors in the defense of the state, the author examines three central ethical issues: the ethical nature and grounding of the duty to participate in defense, the implications of fulfilling this duty during armed conflict, and the question of responsibility for failing to fulfil it. The duty of defense is interpreted as an imperative arising from the very ontology of the state and collective freedom, rather than as a matter of voluntariness. At the same time, attention is drawn to the challenges of its internalization within the context of a contemporary “rights-based society.” Particular focus is given to the problem of crossing the threshold of “direct participation in hostilities,” which may result in the loss of civilian immunity and the blurring of the distinction between legitimate and illegitimate targets, especially under the conditions of modern warfare. Finally, the author analyses the issue of legal and moral responsibility for the failure to fulfil this duty, warning of the dangers of arbitrary and ideologically motivated post-war sanctions. The conclusion is that the optimal implementation of the concept of total defense requires precise normative regulation, clearly defined limits of duty, and proportionate sanctions, in order for the concept to be not only effective, but also morally legitimate and sustainable in the long term.

Sources and literature

References

  1. Agamben, Đorđo. 2018. Homo Sacer – Suverena moć i goli život. Beograd: Karpos.
  2. Babić, Jovan. 2021. „Vojska, zakon i suverenitet.” Vojno delo 73 (3): 2–8. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo2103002B
  3. Barros, Andrew, and Martin Thomas. 2018. The Civilization of War: The Changing Civil-Military Divide, 1914–2014. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Berzina, Ieva. 2020. “From ‘total’ defence to ‘comprehensive’ national defence: the development of the concept in Europe.” Journal of Baltic Security 6 (2): 7–15. DOI: 10.2478/jobs-2020-0006
  5. Bohlin, Jasper. 2025. The Swedish Total Defence Concept – A Whole of Society Approach to Resilience. Hamburg: German Institute for Defence and Strategic Studies.
    Cherleniak, Ivan, and Marian Tokar. 2024. “Effective governance and the doctrine of ‘total defence’ as factors of state stability in wartime.” Democratic Governance 17 (1): 5–17. DOI: 10.23939/dg2024.05
  6. Coady, C.A.J. 2008. “The Status of Combatants.” In Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers, eds. David Rodin and Henry Shue, 153–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Crawford, Emily. 2015. Identifying the Enemy: Civilian Participation in Armed Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Đukić, Anđelija, i Dejan Vuletić. 2023. „Organizacija sistema odbrane prema konceptu totalne odbrane na primeru Švajcarske, Švedske i Srbije.” Međunarodni problemi 75 (4): 621–647. DOI: 10.2298/MEDJP2304621D
  9. Fuzaro, Diego. 2020. Misliti drugačije. Beograd: Clio.
  10. Hobzbaum, Erik. 2010. „Budućnost rata i mira.” U Etika rata - hrestomatija, ur. Dragana Dulić i Branko Romčević, 95–105. Beograd: Fakultet bezbednosti.
  11. Jones, Derek, and J. Bryant Love.2022.“Resilience and Resistance 2.0: initial lessons of Ukraine and the implications of resilience and resistance efforts to deter and respond to invasion and occupation by revisionist powers.” Security Theory and Practice 48 (3): 21–40. DOI: 10.48269/2451-0718-btip-2022-3-001
  12. Khoma, Natalia, Iryna Kresina, Oleksandr Nikolaiev, and Valerii Patalakha [Khoma et al.]. 2025. “National Resilience of Ukraine: Content and Security Strategy in the Context of a War and Post-War Recovery.” European Journal of Law Discourse 12 (3): 41–52. DOI: 10.46340/eppd.2025.12.3.4
    Lukić, Radomir. 1976. Sociologija morala. Beograd: Naučna knjiga.
  13. Ljungkvist, Kristin. 2024. “The military-strategic rationality of hybrid warfare: Everyday total defence under strategic non-peace in the case of Sweden.” European Journal of International Studies 9 (4): 533–552. DOI: 10.1017/eis.2024.18
  14. Mačak, Kubo. 2023. “Will the centre hold? Countering the erosion of the principle of distinction on the digital battlefield.” International Review of the Red Cross 105 (923): 965–991. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383123000152
  15. Melnyk, Serhii, and Yevhen Grygorenko. 2022. “The Law of Ukraine ‘on the Fundamentals of National Resistance’ in the system of defence legislation of Ukraine.” The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 34: 153–160. DOI: 10.26565/2075-1834-2022-34-19
  16. Milkovski, Vangel, i Sandra Božić. 2023. „Koncept totalne odbrane u strategiji odvraćanja Republike Srbije.” Srpska politička misao 80 (2): 7–32. DOI: 10.5937/spm80–44249
  17. Ministarstvo odbrane Republike Srbije [MORS]. 2020. Strategija odbrane Republike Srbije. Beograd: Ministarstvo odbrane Republike Srbije.
  18. Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. 2025. “National Resistance: An Overview of the Ukrainian Comprehensive Defence System.” February 4, 2025. https://mod.gov.ua/en/news/national-resistance-an-overview-of-the-ukrainian-comprehensive-defense-system
  19. Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  20. Patterson, Eric. 2023. “Military Necessity, Proportionality and Discrimination – the case of Veracruz.” In The Ethics of Urban Warfare, eds. Dragan Stanar and Kristina Tonn, 106–125. DOI: 10.1163/9789004522404_008
  21. Peperkamp, Lonneke. 2024. “Technology and Civilianization of Warfare.” Ethics & International Affairs 38 (1): 64–74. DOI: 10.1017/S0892679424000121
  22. Pysmenskyy, Yevhen, and Barbora Hola. 2026. “Exploring criminalization and prosecution of wartime collaboration – The case of Ukraine.” European Journal of Criminology 23 (1): 84–109. DOI: 10.1177/14773708251388357
  23. Radončić, Mina, and Ashley Stanley-Ryan. 2024. “Pro Patria mori: When States encourage civilian involvement in armed conflict.” International Review of the Red Cross 106 (926): 897–930. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383124000468
  24. Rengger, Nicholas. 2008. “The Jus in Bello in Historical and Philosophical Perspective.” In War: Essays in Political Philosophy, ed. Larry May, 30–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  25. Salminen, Pertti. 2011. “Finland’s Comprehensive and Military Defence doctrines responding to Emerging threats and new technologies.” OSCE. May 25, 2011. https://cdn.osce.org/sites/default/files/f/documents/0/3/78104.pdf
  26. Sartori, Đovani. 2001. Demokratija, šta je to? Podgorica: CID.
  27. Spencer Terry, George. 2024. “Responsibilising Total Defence: Interrogating Resistance, Resilience, and Agency in Finland, Sweden, and Lithuania.” Journal of Baltic Security 10 (2): 26–51. DOI: 10.57767/jobs_2024_012
  28. Stanar, Dragan. 2019. Pravedan rat – između apologije i obuzdavanja rata. Beograd: Dobrotoljublje.
  29. Stanar, Dragan. 2021. „Mir kao svrha vojske.” Vojno delo 73 (3): 36–47. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo2103036S
  30. Stanar, Dragan. 2023. „Kosovski zavet – odbrana identiteta kao funkcija vojske.” U Kosovo i Metohija kroz činjenice, tumačenja i simbole – knjiga 3, ur. Dragan Tančić, Milena Vidosavljević i Marina Mijatović, 125–139. Leposavić: Institut za srpsku kulturu Priština.
    Stanar, Dragan, i Srđan Starčević. 2024. „Vojna obaveza kao deo srpskog etosa.” Sociološki pregled 58 (2): 505–525. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg58-49221
  31. Starčević, Srđan, i Dragan Stanar. 2022. “Society of Right-Claiming and Transformation of War and Military at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st Century.” Human Rights Protection Yearbook, ed. Zoran Pavlović, 153–167. Novi Sad: Pokrajinski ombudsman.
    Steinhoff, Uwe. 2007. “Civilians and Soldiers.” In Civilian Immunity in War, ed. Igor Primoratz, 42–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Stojković, Dejan, i Blažo Radović. 2024. Koncept totalne odbrane – sažetak. Beograd: MC Odbrana.
  32. Volzer, Majkl. 2010. Pravedni i nepravedni ratovi. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.
  33. Vračar, Milinko, i Goran Stanojević. 2019. „Strateška kultura i koncept totalne odbrane.” Vojno delo 71 (8): 294–315. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1908294V
  34. Živanović, Vukojica, i Slobodan Radojević. 2024. „Politika odbrane zasnovana na konceptu totalne odbrane.” Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 26 (1): 165–188. DOI: 10.5937/pnb26-50355
From the same issue

Related publications