Политичка ревија 4/2021

ЕВРОПСКА УНИЈА КАО АКТЕР У МЕЂУНАРОДНИМ ОДНОСИМА: МОЋ ДИСКУРСА

УДКУДК 327(4-672EU) Стране11-34 Година2021
Преузми PDF 10.22182/pr.7042021.1
Преглед истраживања

Сажетак

У савременој академској литератури постоји мноштво дефиниција које настоје да укажу на специфичност ЕУ као актера у међународним односима. У овом раду, ауторкa се ослања на постструктуралистичко становиште у међународним односима, те полази од става да ЕУ не поседује предискурзиван идентитет, већ је њен идентитет изграђен кроз дискурс. У складу са постструктуралистичким становиштем, ауторка заступа став да идентитет ЕУ захтева “спољашњег другог” кога истовремено и конструише. Рад је стога усмерен на моћ која се налази у основи односа „ја–други”, те на представе и праксе које омогућавају изградњу супериорности и инфериорности у овом односу. У првом делу рада представљају се основе постструктуралистичког становишта у међународним односима и студијама европске интеграције. Други и трећи део рада анализирају дискурсе ЕУ као заједнице вредности и глобалног актера. У фокусу анализе су изјаве званичника ЕУ и стратешка документа која дефинишу ЕУ као актера на међународној сцени. Кроз ове дискурсе, ЕУ производи „знање” о својој супериорности у односу на спољашње друге, чиме се обезбеђује легитимитет репрезентативних пракси. Закључује се да дискурзивна конструкција ЕУ као актера у међународним односима нужно не захтева конструисање другог као радикално различитог, са јасним границама између ЕУ и других, већ да и изградња флуидних граница између ЕУ и њених амбивалентних других може такође довести до деловања ЕУ као модерног актера, налик држави.

Извори и литература

Референце

  1. Вукчевић, Дејана. 2009. „Безбедносна политика и стратешка еволуција Европске уније”, Политичка ревија (3): 167 – 190.
  2. Европска стратегија безбедности. 2006. ,,Безбедна Европа у бољем свету”. Европска стратегија безбедности. Београд: ISAC Fond.
  3. „Заједничка визија, удружено деловање: јача Европа – Глобална стратегија за спољну и безбедносну политику Европске уније.” 2016. Београд: Министарство спољних послова Републике Србије, Институт за европске студије, Центар за међународне и безбедносне послове– ISAC фонд.
  4. Ковачевић Маја. 2020. „Политика проширења Европске уније у потрази за реформом.” Политичка ревија 64 (2): 133 – 150. doi: 10.22182/pr.6422020.6.
  5. Aggestam, Lisbeth. 2008. “Introduction: Ethical Power Europe?” International Affairs, 84 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2346.2008.00685.x.
  6. Ashton, Catherine. 2011. “Munich Security Conference.” In European Union security and defence. Core documents 2010, ed. Catherine Glière, 25 – 28. Paris: Institute for Security Studies.
  7. Barbé, Esther, and Pol Morillas. 2019. “The EU global strategy: the dynamics of a more politicized and politically integrated foreign policy.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (6): 753 – 770. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1588227.
  8. Biscop, Sven. 2016. “The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics.” Security Policy Brief, n° 75. EGMONT Royal Institute for International Relations, June 2016.http://www.egmontinstitute.be/content/uploads/2016/06/SPB75.pdf?type=pdf.
  9. Bono, Giovanna. 2006. “The Perils of Conceiving EU Foreign Policy as a ‘Civilizing’ Force.” Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, (1): 150 – 163.
  10. Borg, Stefan. 2014. “European integration and the problem of the state: universality, particularity, and exemplarity in the crafting of the European Union.” Journal of International Relations and Development 17 (3): 339 – 366. doi: 10.1057/jird.2013.8.
  11. Börzel, Tanja, and Thomas Risse. 2009. The Transformative Power of Europe – The European Union and the Diffusion of Ideas. Berlin: Kolleg–Forschergruppe (KFG)Working Paper Series.
  12. Browning, Christopher.2003. “The Internal/External Security Paradox and the Reconstruction of Boundaries in the Baltic: The Case of Kaliningrad.” Alternatives 28 (5): 545 – 581. doi: 10.1177/030437540302800502.
  13. Campbell, David. 2013. “Poststructuralism.” In International Relations Theories. Discipline and Diversity, third edition, eds. Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith, 223 – 246. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  14. .Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  15. Cebeci, Münevver. 2016. “Constructing the EU as a Global Actor: A Critical Analysis of European Democracy Promotion.” In Challenges of Democracy in the European Union and Its Neighbors, eds. Aylin Ünver Noi and Sasha Toperich, 165 – 182. Washington: Johns Hopkins University.
  16. Connolly, William. 1991. Identity/Difference. Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  17. Delanty, Gerard. 1995. Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press.
  18. Delegation of the European Union to China. 2017. “Federica Mogherini’s speech at the Conference ‘Thinking Europe Forward’ on the occasion of the 25th anniversary of the Treaty of Maastricht.” Delegation of the European Union to China, Maastricht, 28 September 2017. https://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/china/33162/federica–mogherinis–speech–conference–thinking–europe–forward–occasion–25th–anniversary–treaty_ga.
  19. Diez, Thomas. 2005. “Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’“ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33 (3): 613 – 636. doi: 10.1177/03058298050330031701.
  20. Diez, Thomas. 2006. “The Paradoxes of Europe’s Borders.” Comparative European Politics, 4: 235 – 252. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110083.
  21. Diez, Thomas. 2014. “Postmodern Approaches.” In Theories of International Relations, eds. Siegfried Schieder and Manuela Spindler, 287–303. London and New York: Routledge.
  22. Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1993. “Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post–Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines.” International Studies Quarterly, 37 (3): 297 – 320. doi: 10.2307/2600810.
  23. Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1996. Imperial Encounters. The Politics of Representation in North–South Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  24. Duchêne, François. 1973. “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence.” In A Nation Writ Large? Foreign–Policy Problems before the European Community, eds. Max Kohnstamm and Wolfgang Hage, 1 – 21. London: Macmillan
  25. European Commission. 2018. “Europe in a volatile world – Exporting stability to its neighbourhood.” European Commission. September 26, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014–2019/hahn/announcements/europe–volatile–world–exporting–stability–its–neighbourhood–speech–eu–commissioner–johannes–hahn_en.
  26. Hall, Stuart. 1997. “The Spectacle of the Other.” In Representations.Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, ed. Stuart Hall, 223 – 279. London: Sage and the Open Society.
  27. Hall, Stuart. 1992. “The West and the Rest. Discourse and Power.” In Formations of Modernity, eds. Stuart Hall and Bram Gieben, 275 – 331. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  28. Hansen, Lene. 2006. Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London and New York: Routledge.
  29. Hülsse, Rainer. 2006. “Imagine the EU: the metaphorical construction of a supra–nationalist identity”, Journal of International Relations and Development, 9: 396 – 421. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800105.
  30. Ivić, Sanja. 2016. European Identity and Citizenship. Between Modernity and Postmodernity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  31. Johansson–Nogués, Elisabeth. 2018. “The EU’s ontological (in)security: stabilising the ENP area … and the EU–self?” Cooperation and Conflict 53 (4): 528 – 544. doi: 10.1177/0010836717750197.
  32. Juncos, Ana. 2017. “Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn?”, European Security 26 (1): 1–18. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809.
  33. Klinke, Ian. 2015. “European Integration Studies and the European Union’s Eastern Gaze.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (2): 567 – 583. doi: 10.1177/0305829814552833.
  34. Klose, Stephan. 2018. “Theorizing the EU’s actorness: Towards an Interactionist Role Theory Framework.” Journal of CommonMarket Studies 56 (5): 1 – 17. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12725.
  35. Mälksoo, Maria. 2016. “From the ESS to the EU Global Strategy: external policy, internal purpose.” Contemporary Security Policy 37 (3): 374–388. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2016.1238245.
  36. Manners, Ian. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235 – 258. doi: 10.1111/1468–5965.00353.
  37. Manners, Ian. 2006. “The European Union as a Normative Power: A Response to Thomas Diez.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 35 (1): 167 – 180. doi: 10.1177/03058298060350010201.
  38. Manners, Ian. 2008. “The normative ethics of the European Union.” International Affairs 84 (1): 45–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–2346.2008.00688.x.
  39. Manners, Ian, and Whitman, Richard. 2003. “The ‘Difference Engine’: Constructing and Representing the International Identity of the European Union.” Journal of European Public Policy 10 (3): 380 – 404. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000085360.
  40. Meyer, Hartmut, and Voigt, Henri. 2006. A Responsible Europe? Ethical Foundations of EU External Affairs. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  41. Moravcsik, Andrew. 2009. “Europe: The quiet superpower.” French Politics, 7 (3/4): 403–422. doi: 10.1057/fp.2009.29.
  42. Neumann, Iver. 1998. “European Identity, EU Expansion, and the Integration/Exclusion Nexus.” Alternatives 23 (3): 397 – 416. doi: 10.1177/030437549802300305.
  43. Neumann, Iver. 1999. Uses of the Other. “The East” in European Identity Formation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  44. Neumann, Iver, and Welsh, Jennifer. 1991. “The Other in European Self–Definition. An Addendum to the Literature on International Society.” Review of International Studies 17 (4): 327 – 348. doi: 10.1017/S0260210500112045.
  45. Nicolaidis, Kalipso, and Howse, Robert. 2002. “This is my EUtopia…’: Narrative as Power”, Journal ofCommon Market Studies 40 (4): 767–792. doi: 10.1111/1468–5965.00397.
  46. Nye, Joseph. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
  47. Pace, Michelle. 2007. “The Construction of EU Normative Power.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (5): 1041 – 1064. doi: 10.1111/j.1468–5965.2007.00759.x
  48. Prodi, Romano. 2002. “A wider Europe – A Proximity Policy as the key to stability.” Brussels, 5– 6 December 2002. https://ec.europa.eu/dorie/fileDownload.do,jsessionid=ZPw6JXzbQkvyTcgsmtF1QLFGBLmfjD3DcnTJFd1bYcV2c5ky2NXl!469751194?docId=255969&cardId=255969
  49. Rehn, Olli. 2006a. “Beyond Homogeneity.” Conference at the Central European University, Budapest, 9 February 2006. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_06_80
  50. Rehn, Olli. 2006b. “Europe’s Next Frontiers.” Lecture at the Foreign Affairs Association, Munich, 20 October 2006b, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_06_626.
  51. Ruggie, John. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47(1): 139 – 74. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300004732.
  52. Rumelili, Bahar. 2007. Constructing Regional Community and Order in Europe and Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  53. Rumelili, Bahar. 2004. “Constructing Identity and Relating to Difference: Understanding the EU’s Mode of Differentiation.” Review of International Studies 30 (1): 27 – 47. doi: 10.1017/S0260210504005819.
  54. SSchimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. “Liberal Identity and Postnationalist Inclusion: The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.” In Constructing Europe’s Identity: The External Dimension, ed. Lars–Erik Cederman, 165–186. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  55. Sjöstedt, Gunnar. 1977. The External Role of the European Community. Farnborough: Saxon House.
  56. Speech by EU Commission President Barroso, “The EU and US: A declaration of interdependence”, SPEECH05/417. Washington: School of Advanced International Studies, 18 October 2005.
  57. Speech by Javier Solana, EU High Representative for theCommon Foreign and Security Policy, “The Sound of Europe Conference.” Salzburg, 27 January 2006,https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/discours/88179.pdf
  58. Strȧth, Bo. 2002. “A European Identity. To the Historical Limits of a Concept.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(4): 387 – 401. doi: 10.1177/136843102760513965.
  59. Van Ham, Peter. 2001. “Europe’s Postmodern Identity: A Critical Appraisal.” International Politics 38: 229 – 252. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.ip.8892572.
  60. Vukasović, Dejana. 2020. Constructing A (EU)ropean Identity: The Balkans and the Western Balkans as the Other. Belgrade: Institute for Political Studies.
  61. Waever, Ole. 2004. “Discursive Approaches.” In European Integration Theory, eds. Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez, 197 – 215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  62. Walker, R.B.J. 2000. “Europe is Not Where it is Supposed to Be.” In International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power Security Community, eds. Morten Kelstrup and Michael Williams, 14 – 32. London and New York:Routledge.
  63. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  64. Whitman, Richard. 2006. “Road Map for a Route March? (De–)civilianizing through the EU’s Security Strategy.” Euro­pean Fo­re­ign Af­fa­irs Re­vi­ew 11 (1): 1 – 15.
Из истог броја

Повезане публикације